ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳

 

HP4D2E      Half Unit
Principles of Health Technology Assessment

This information is for the 2024/25 session.

Teacher responsible

Mr Alexander Carter

Availability

This course is available on the Executive MSc in Health Economics, Outcomes and Management in Clinical Sciences and Executive MSc in Health Economics, Policy and Management. This course is not available as an outside option.

Course content

Health Technology Assessment a multidisciplinary process that summarises information about the medical, social, economic, and ethical issues related to the use of a health technology in a systematic, transparent, unbiased, and robust manner. Health Technology Assessment differs in its governance, data and evidence requirements, assessment methods, and operational arrangements across different settings and contexts. This course is aimed at introducing the key principles of Health Technology Assessment, its operational modalities, the different models of value assessment and how they link to decision-making.

Outline of the course is included below:

1. The role of Health Technology Assessment in health care decision making

2. Models of Health Technology Assessment and their application in different jurisdictions - a comparative perspective

3. Governance issues (position in health care decision-making, topic selection, assessment process, stakeholder involvement)

4. Data and evidence requirements for value assessment

5. Health Technology Assessment and value assessment: focus on clinical benefit assessment

6. Health Technology Assessment and value assessment: focus on clinical-cost-effectiveness

7. Assessment methods in Health Technology Assessment

8. Explaining similarities and differences in Health Technology Assessment recommendations – a toolkit

9. The role of multiple criteria decision analysis in value assessment

10. Beyond Health Technology Assessment: links to risk-sharing and special purchasing arrangements

Teaching

This course will be delivered as a combination lectures and seminars, totalling a minimum of 20 hours. 

Formative coursework

A selection of multiple choice and/or open-ended questions to test extent of knowledge and understanding of syllabus

Indicative reading

Chalkidou, K., Tunis, S., Lopert, R., Rochaix, L., Sawicki, P. T., Nasser, M., & Xerri, B. (2009). Comparative Effectiveness Research and Evidence‐Based Health Policy: Experience from Four Countries. Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), 339-367.

Banta, H. D., & Luce, B. R. (1993). Health care technology and its assessment: an international perspective.

Drummond, M. F., Schwartz, J. S., Jönsson, B., Luce, B. R., Neumann, P. J., Siebert, U., & Sullivan, S. D. (2008). Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 24(03), 244-258.

Sorenson, C., Drummond, M., & Kanavos, P. (2008). Ensuring value for money in health care: the role of health technology assessment in the European Union (No. 11). WHO Regional Office Europe.

Sorenson, C. (2010). Use of comparative effectiveness research in drug coverage and pricing decisions: a six-country comparison. Issue Brief (Commonwealth Fund), 91, 1-14.

Assessment

Research project (100%) in the post-spring term.

Student performance results

(2020/21 - 2022/23 combined)

Classification % of students
Distinction 32.9
Merit 45.2
Pass 17.1
Fail 4.8

Key facts

Department: Health Policy

Total students 2023/24: Unavailable

Average class size 2023/24: Unavailable

Controlled access 2023/24: No

Value: Half Unit

Course selection videos

Some departments have produced short videos to introduce their courses. Please refer to the course selection videos index page for further information.

Personal development skills

  • Problem solving
  • Application of information skills
  • Communication
  • Specialist skills