Not available in 2020/21
GV313 Half Unit
Politics of Trade in Comparative Perspective
This information is for the 2020/21 session.
Teacher responsible
Prof Stephanie Rickard
Availability
This course is available on the BSc in Government, BSc in Government and Economics, BSc in Government and History, BSc in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, BSc in Politics, BSc in Politics and Economics, BSc in Politics and History, BSc in Politics and International Relations and BSc in Politics and Philosophy. This course is not available as an outside option nor to General Course students.
This course is capped at three groups. The deadline for enrolments is 12:00 noon on Friday 4 October 2019.
Pre-requisites
A background in political economy would be advantageous.
Course content
The course focuses on the role of institutions and interests in the process and formulation of trade policy. We examine the causal influences of institutions and interests in trade, focusing predominantly on developed countries. We draw on theories from economics and political science and analyze these using both historical and contemporary examples, and do so from a comparative perspective, rather than an international relations perspective.
The primary focus of the course is on actual policy outcomes.
Teaching
15 hours of lectures and 10 hours of seminars in the LT.
There will be a reading week in Week 6.
Formative coursework
Weekly writing assignments.
Indicative reading
Frieden, Lake and Schultz (2010) World Politics. 216-233.
Hiscox, Michael. (2002) “Commerce, Coalitions, and Factor Mobility: Evidence from Congressional Votes on Trade Legislation.” American Political Science Review 96(3): 593-608.
Milner, Helen V. and Keiko Kubota. (2005) “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59 (Winter): 107-144.
Rickard, Stephanie J. (2010) “Democratic Differences: Electoral Institutions and Compliance with GATT/WTO Agreements.” European Journal of International Relations 16(4): 711-729.
Nielson, Daniel L. (2003). Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in Middle-Income Presidential Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47:3 470-491.
C. Schonhardt-Bailey, From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas and Institutions in Historical Perspective (MIT Press, 2006).
Zahrnt, Valentin. (2008). Domestic constituents and the formulation of WTO negotiating positions: what the delegates say. World Trade Review 7 (2): 393-421.
Wei and Zhang (2010) Do external interventions work? The case of trade reform conditions in IMF supported programs Journal of Development Economics Volume 92, Issue 1, May 2010, Pages 71–81.
Frieden, Jeffry, Ronald Rogowski. (1996) “The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview.” In Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Edited by Robert Keohane and Helen Milner, p. 25-47.
Assessment
Essay (100%, 4000 words).
Student performance results
(2017/18 - 2019/20 combined)
| Classification | % of students |
|---|---|
| First | 18.4 |
| 2:1 | 67.3 |
| 2:2 | 10.2 |
| Third | 0 |
| Fail | 4.1 |
Important information in response to COVID-19
Please note that during 2020/21 academic year some variation to teaching and learning activities may be required to respond to changes in public health advice and/or to account for the situation of students in attendance on campus and those studying online during the early part of the academic year. For assessment, this may involve changes to mode of delivery and/or the format or weighting of assessments. Changes will only be made if required and students will be notified about any changes to teaching or assessment plans at the earliest opportunity.
Key facts
Department: Government
Total students 2019/20: 13
Average class size 2019/20: 6
Capped 2019/20: Yes (45)
Value: Half Unit
Personal development skills
- Self-management
- Problem solving
- Communication
- Specialist skills
