杏吧论坛

Dr Babken Babajanian

This course is available on the Double Master of Public Administration (杏吧论坛-Columbia), Double Master of Public Administration (杏吧论坛-Sciences Po), Double Master of Public Administration (杏吧论坛-University of Toronto), MPA Dual Degree (杏吧论坛 and Columbia), MPA Dual Degree (杏吧论坛 and Hertie), MPA Dual Degree (杏吧论坛 and NUS), MPA Dual Degree (杏吧论坛 and Sciences Po), MPA Dual Degree (杏吧论坛 and Tokyo), Master of Public Administration and Master of Public Policy. This course is available with permission as an outside option to students on other programmes where regulations permit.

The course is capped at 30.  This course has a limited number of places (it is controlled access) and demand is typically very high. Priority is given to students from the School of Public Policy, students from other programmes will be considered if places remain.

Students from outside the School of Public Policy will need to have some previous policy experience.

The course will focus on conceptual, theoretical and practical issues involved in the development of social protection programmes in the global context. It will enable students to (i) recognise the objectives and role of social protection programmes and (ii) analyse and critically assess the design, implementation, and evaluation of social protection programmes. The course will consider the design and performance of social protection within the specific economic, social, political economy and institutional context of their operation.

Social protection refers to policies and programmes designed to reduce poverty and vulnerability and improve people's ability to manage economic, social, governance, environmental, and lifecycle risks. 

In recent years, social protection has become a key instrument of public policy in the global south and it is no longer seen as an exclusive feature of the western welfare state. Building responsive social protection systems is a priority for many governments in Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and international development organisations are heavily involved in supporting national efforts.

These developments have generated a strong demand for policy experts who can analyse, interpret, design and evaluate social protection programmes. The course will help students acquire in-depth knowledge and skills for analytical work and practical engagement in programme development. It will enable them to critically appraise how government agencies, international organisations and other actors design and implement social protection programmes.

The course will discuss major social protection programmes, including Bolsa Familia in Brazil, Juntos in Peru, Oportunidades/Prospera in Mexico, Dibao in China, Pantawid Pamilyang in the Philippines and LEAP in Ghana.

The course draws on academic literature and research studies and analytical reports commissioned by government agencies and international organisations. The chosen sources reflect the most recent developments in social protection worldwide. The course utilises the course leader's extensive hands-on experience in the analysis and evaluation of social protection programmes.

This course is delivered through a combination of lectures and seminars totalling a minimum of 27 hours across Lent Term. 

1. Seminar presentations on assigned topics and contribution to seminar discussions.  Each student is expected to do at least one presentation.

2. An essay answering a pre-assigned question (800 words)

3. A short individually-authored critique of a policy report (max 1,000 words)

• Devereux, S et al (2017) The Targeting Effectiveness of Social Transfers, Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9:2, 162-211. .
• Holmes, R. and N. Jones (2013) Gender and Social Protection in the Developing World: Beyond Mothers and Safety Nets. London and New York: Zed Books.
• Robalino, D. A., Rawlings, L. and I. Walker (2012) Building Social Protection and Labor Systems. Concepts and Operational Implications. Washington, DC: World Bank.
• Standing, G (2007 Social Protection, Development in Practice, Vol. 17, No. 4/5, pp. 511-522

Essay (30%) in the LT.
Critical evaluation (70%) in the ST.

• An essay (30%), in which students answer a pre-assigned question (max 1,000 words).
• An individually authored critique of a policy report (70%) (max 3,000 words).