杏吧论坛

Dr Gisa Weszkalnys

This course is available on the MSc in Anthropology and Development, MSc in Anthropology and Development Management and MSc in Social Anthropology. This course is available with permission as an outside option to students on other programmes where regulations permit.

In August 2016, scientists participating in the Anthropocene Working Group put forward an official recommendation to rename our present time interval ‘the Anthropocene’. It postulates that humans now exert recognisable influences on the earth’s bio- and geophysical systems sufficient to warrant the naming of a distinct geological epoch encompassing the earth’s present, recent past, and indefinite future. The Anthropocene thus echoes contemporary anxieties about climate change, the deterioration of global ecologies, and other environmental crises on unprecedented scales, as well as humans’ capacity to devise adequate solutions to the problems they face. The scholarly and popular debate on the Anthropocene has exploded in recent years, with anthropologists contributing both theoretical and important ethnographic insight into how people apprehend and deal with the repercussions of anthropogenic environmental change. It now seems that the continued successful existence of humanity on this planet will require us to live differently both with each other and with the earth: ‘We will go onwards in a different mode of humanity or not at all’ (Val Plumwood 2007).

In this course, we will approach the Anthropocene as a contested category, with evident political and ethical implications. We will begin by examining the dramatic changes in the relationship between humans and their natural environments brought about by industrialisation, specifically, the increased exploitation of natural resources as well as the production and use of fossil fuels on a large scale. We will attend to the practices and cosmologies of people who in their everyday lives – for example, by digging, polluting, and wasting – participate in the work of anthropogenic alterations, drawing on case studies from across the world. We will consider alternative labels, such as the Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Plasticene, Eurocene, Misanthropocene, and Neologocene, each of which tells a different origin story for what Donna Haraway has called ‘the trouble’. However, we then move to ask whether the Anthropocene might be less a marker of an epochal transformation than a signal of a profound anti-political shift in discussions about the future of the planet. We will inspect the scientific and non-scientific controversies the Anthropocene has provoked, and the particular forms of power, authority, reason, imagination, and subjectivity it has generated.

Students will be expected to engage with a variety of resources, including online publications, blogs, documentary and feature films, and other media, and an emergent interdisciplinary literature, spanning the social and natural sciences, which we will read in relation to a more long-standing engagement with the environment within the anthropological discipline. This will lead us to interrogate established binaries of human/nonhuman, subject/object, and nature/culture, and, significantly, to ask about the critical valence of anthropologists’ enquiry into the ‘anthropos’ for an age so profoundly shaped by humans. What methods and modes of analysis are required to comprehend the diverse human/non-human interactions and seemingly incommensurable scales that the Anthropocene invokes? What types of collaboration, knowledge, and mutual care does an anthropocenic outlook make possible? How can we anchor the manifold theoretical proposals that have been put forward not just in ethnographic examples but also in own ‘experiments for living’?

7 hours of lectures, 7 hours of seminars and 6 hours of workshops in the AT.

The course is comprised of three cycles of three weeks plus an additional, concluding week. Each cycle consists of two weeks taught in the traditional lecture/seminar format, and a third week with a two-hour workshop in a larger group. While the one-hour seminars will focus on core readings set by the lecturer, the two-hour workshop will, in addition, offer space for viewing other resources (films, online material), discussing students independently researched material, student presentations, etc.

Students will be expected to produce 1 essay and 1 presentation in the AT.

N. Clark and B. Szerszynski (2020) Planetary Social Thought: The Anthropocene challenge to the social sciences

J. Cruikshank (2005) Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters, and Social Imagination

D. Haraway (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene

K. Hetherington (2019) Infrastructure, Environment, and Life in the Anthropocene

V. Ialenti (2020) Deep Time Reckoning: How Future Thinking Can Help Earth Now

E. Kohn (2013) How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human

D. McDermott Hughes (2017) Energy without Conscience: Oil, Climate Change, and Complicity

N.C. Kawa (2016) Amazonia in the Anthropocene: People, Soils, Plants, Forests

J. Salazar Parreñas (2018) Decolonizing Extiction: The Work of Care in Orangutan Rehabilitation

A. Tsing et al. (2017) Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet

Essay (100%, 4000 words) in the WT.