ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳

The Research Excellence Framework (REF) is the system by which the UK’s higher education funding bodies assess the quality of research in publicly funded UK higher education institutions (HEIs).  REF 2021 comprised three elements:

• academic outputs, comprising a portfolio based on the FTE of REF-eligible staff submitted;

• research impact, submitted as a number of impact case studies (ICSs) in proportion to the total FTE of REF-eligible staff submitted;

• research environment, comprising the total number of research degrees awarded between 2014 and 2020, total research income received over the same time period, and an environment statement detailing how the submitting unit(s) supported research and impact over the period.

Outputs, impact and environment were weighted 60:25:15 respectively.  All three elements were graded on a scale from 0 (unclassified) to 4* (world leading) and the results were published as quality profiles showing the percentage of outputs, impact and environment considered to meet each of the starred levels. 

Submissions were invited to 34 Units of Assessment (UoAs); ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳ made 15 submissions to 13 UoAs across the  subjects.

For REF2021, HEIs were required to submit research outputs by all eligible members of staff.  Each submitted member of staff could submit between one and five outputs, with the total number of outputs per UoA calculated as total FTE of staff multiplied by 2.5.

Staff were eligible for REF2021 where they were on a teaching-and-research or research-only contract of at least 0.2 FTE on 31 July 2020 and had a substantive connection to the submitting HEI.  Research-only staff also had to be classified as independent researchers.  HEIs were also required to identify which eligible staff had significant responsibility for research.  ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳ submitted 100% of its staff meeting these definitions, but other HEIs had eligible staff who did not have significant responsibility for research and hence had a submission rate of less than 100%.

View a.

Research Excellence Framework 2014: Impact  

ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳'s impact case study submissions to REF2014's Social Work and Social Policy Unit of Assessment all received 4* grading. The following ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳ Health case study was submitted by the . 

Re-igniting R&D for antibiotics
Professor Elias Mossialos

This case study focused on ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳ Health's work analysing the nature of the incentives necessary to get antibiotic R&D going again in order to address decreasing investment by the pharmaceutical industry in much needed antibiotics. In particular it served as the basis for an urgent request by the EU Council for action and sparked the formation of the critical ‘transatlantic taskforce’ (TATFAR): the first major international collaboration to tackle antibiotic resistance.

Recommendations from the work served as the foundation for an EU-level public/private partnership and for US regulatory reform.

REF2014 ubmitted Impact Case Study – Mossialos

Other relevant ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳ case studies

Dr Jose-Luis Fernandez, Raphael Wittenberg and Adelina Comas-Herrera

Martin Knapp, David McDaid, Adelina Comas-Herrera

Professor Tim Allen

Alec Morton and Mara Airoldi

Oriana Bandiera

Richard Layard

Nancy Cartwright

Overall Results

When taking into account the percentage of research rated 4* or 3*, the Department of Social Policy (along with the Departments of International Development, Media and Comunications and Government and International Relations (combined entry)) ranked first.

ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳HSC's co-directors Professors Martin Knapp and Elias Mossialos said:

"These are fantastic results for ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳, and in particular for the Department of Social Policy. We are delighted that the Centre has contributed 50% of the Department's impact case studies to REF2014 and that these have all been ranked 4*. This reflects the excellent research taking place within our research centre".